Who is Online

We have 167 guests and no members online

The Art Galleries

 

 

London, like Paris and New York, is famous for its many public galleries and private collections. 

In London the Tate and Tate Modern have more recent works as well as a large collection of the works of Turner; while the National Gallery has a more classical collection; although there is some overlap.  The National Portrait Gallery has what the name implies.  Many artists represented in these collections also have works in Australian public collections, so it is interesting to see their other works close at hand and to compare techniques and subject matter. 

The Tate holds a number of English pre-Raphaelites and their Royal Academy contemporaries. These were also enormously popular with nineteenth century Australian collectors. 

Australian artists have long studied in London and Paris and some English artists made their home in Australia so we find numerous artists of the period in common between English and Australian collections.

 

 


The Queen of Sheba before Soloman
E J Poynter 1890 - in Sydney

The Lady of Shalott
John William Waterhouse 1888 - in London


 

Amongst the pre-Raphaelites was Solomon J Soloman's Birth of Eve that until recently hung in the Art Gallery of NSW in Sydney (as part of the Schaeffer Collection); where I thought it still was.  To my surprise there it was in London in the Tate; so I presume that it has been sold, back to where it was painted.  But it was like running into someone you know.


Birth of Eve in Sydney in 2011

Birth of Eve in London in 2013

 

It is also interesting these days to see works by often more contemporary British artists not represented in Australia.  Australian curators and trustees have a more active domestic art scene to buy from and seem to look more towards America and Asia for overseas acquisitions these days.

Here are some more contemporary images from the Tate Modern and the Tate; not all British.

 


Epstein's Jacob and the Angel

 

I can't see an Epstein sculpture without remembering the patently untrue but amusing limerick:

There's an extraordinary family named Stein
There's Gert and there's Ep and there's Ein
Gert's poetry's bunk
Ep's sculpture is junk
And nobody understands Ein

 

Unfortunately, as I have complained elsewhere, several galleries in London prohibit photographs.  But you can see many of them 'on line', many in Google's Art-Project, in much better definition than you might be able to get by photographing them without optimal lighting.

Edinburgh is home to the Scottish National Gallery collection;  Again there are resonances with Australian collections.  I spent several happy hours there and was pleased to be allowed to take photographs.   This is a brief snapshot:

 

 

Two Rembrandts; he certainly was prolific.  He seems to be represented in almost every major collection including several in Russia and Australia; as is Monet.  And you may notice that Rodin's The Kiss is unexpectedly in Scotland.   It's on loan from the Tate in London.

 

 

No comments

Travel

Israel

 

 

 

 

 

2024 Addendum

 

It's shocking that another Addendum to this article is necessary.

Yet, we are no nearer to a peaceful resolution like the, internationally called for, 'Two state solution', or some workable version thereof.

Indeed, the situation, particularly for Palestinians, has gone from bad to worse.

At the same time, Israeli losses are mounting as the war drags on.  Yet, Hamas remains undefeated and Bibi remains recalcitrant.

Comments:

 On Wed, 4 Sep 2024, at 1:23 PM, Barry Cross wrote:
> There seems to be no resolution to the problem of the disputed land of Israel. You consider Gaza to have been put under siege, but I wonder if that and the other Israeli acts you mention are themselves responses to a response by them of being under siege, or at least being seriously threatened, by hostile forces who do not recognise the legitimacy of the state of Israel? Hamas’s claim and stated intention of establishing a Palestinian state “from the river to the sea” and periodic acts of aggression need to be taken into account I suggest, when judging the actions of the Israeli’s. In addition, there is the menace coming from Iranian proxies in Southern Lebanon and Yemen, and from Iran itself.
>
> Whatever the merits of the respective claims to the contended territory might be, it seems reasonable to accept that Israeli’s to consider they are a constant threat to their very survival. Naturally, this must influence their actions, particularly in response to the many acts of aggression they have been subjected to over many decades. By way of contrast, how lucky are we!
>
> These are my off the cuff comments for what they are worth.
>
> Regards
> Barry Cross
>
> Sent from my iPhone

 

 

 

2023 Addendum

 

It's a decade since this visit to Israel in September 2014.

From July until just a month before we arrived, Israeli troops had been conducting an 'operation' against Hamas in the Gaza strip, in the course of which 469 Israeli soldiers lost their lives.  The country was still reeling. 

17,200 Garzan homes were totally destroyed and three times that number were seriously damaged.  An estimated 2,000 (who keeps count) civilians died in the destruction.  'Bibi' Netanyahu, who had ordered the Operation, declared it a victory.

This time it's on a grander scale: a 'War', and Bibi has vowed to wipe-out Hamas.

Pundits have been moved to speculate on the Hamas strategy, that was obviously premeditated. In addition to taking hostages, it involving sickening brutality against obvious innocents, with many of the worst images made and published by themselves. 

It seemed to be deliberate provocation, with a highly predictable outcome.

Martyrdom?  

Historically, Hamas have done Bibi no harm.  See: 'For years, Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now it’s blown up in our faces' in the Israel Times.

Thinking about our visit, I've been moved to wonder how many of today's terrorists were children a decade ago?  How many saw their loved ones: buried alive; blown apart; maimed for life; then dismissed by Bibi as: 'collateral damage'? 

And how many of the children, now stumbling in the rubble, will, in their turn, become terrorists against the hated oppressor across the barrier?

Is Bibi's present purge a good strategy for assuring future harmony?

I commend my decade old analysis to you: A Brief Modern History and Is there a solution?

Comments: 
Since posting the above I've been sent the following article, implicating religious belief, with which I substantially agree, save for its disregarding the Jewish fundamentalists'/extremists' complicity; amplifying the present horrors: The Bright Line Between Good and Evil 

Another reader has provided a link to a perspective similar to my own by Australian 'Elder Statesman' John MenadueHamas, Gaza and the continuing Zionist project.  His Pearls and Irritations site provides a number of articles relating to the current Gaza situation. Worth a read.

The Economist has since reported and unusual spate of short-selling immediately preceding the attacks: Who made millions trading the October 7th attacks?  

Money-making by someone in the know? If so, it's beyond evil.

 

 

A Little Background

The land between the Jordan river and the Mediterranean Sea, known as Palestine, is one of the most fought over in human history.  Anthropologists believe that the first humans to leave Africa lived in and around this region and that all non-African humans are related to these common ancestors who lived perhaps 70,000 years ago.  At first glance this interest seems odd, because as bits of territory go it's nothing special.  These days it's mostly desert and semi-desert.  Somewhere back-o-Bourke might look similar, if a bit redder. 

Yet since humans have kept written records, Egyptians, Canaanites, Philistines, Ancient Israelites, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Byzantines, early Muslims, Christian Crusaders, Ottomans (and other later Muslims), British and Zionists, have all fought to control this land.  This has sometimes been for strategic reasons alone but often partly for affairs of the heart, because this land is steeped in history and myth. 

Read more: Israel

Fiction, Recollections & News

DUNE

 

Last week I went to see ‘DUNE’, the movie.

It’s the second big-screen attempt to make a movie of the book, if you don’t count the first ‘Star Wars’, that borrows shamelessly from Frank Herbert’s Si-Fi classic.

Read more: DUNE

Opinions and Philosophy

Renewable Electricity

 

 

As the energy is essentially free, renewable electricity costs, like those of nuclear electricity, are almost entirely dependent on the up-front construction costs and the method of financing these.  Minimising the initial investment, relative to the expected energy yield, is critical to commercial viability.  But revenue is also dependent on when, and where, the energy can be delivered to meet the demand patterns of energy consumers.

For example, if it requires four times the capital investment in equipment to extract one megawatt hour (1 MWh) of useable electricity from sunlight, as compared to extracting it from wind, engineers need to find ways of quartering the cost of solar capture and conversion equipment; or increasing the energy converted to electricity fourfold; to make solar directly competitive.

Read more: Renewable Electricity

Terms of Use

Terms of Use                                                                    Copyright