Who is Online

We have 84 guests and no members online

 

I've long been interested in the advent of artificial intelligence (AI). It's a central theme in my fictional writing (The Cloud and The Craft) and is discussed in my essay to my children 'The Meaning of Life' (1997-2017). So, I've recently been exploring the capabilities of ChatGPT.

As today, 26 January 2024, is Australia Day, I asked ChatGPT to: 'write 1000 words about Australia Day date'.  In a few minutes (I read each as it arrived) I had four, quite different, versions. Each took around 18 seconds to generate. This is the result:

 

Version 1

Australia Day is an annual national celebration that holds great significance for Australians, commemorating the arrival of the First Fleet at Sydney Cove in 1788. Observed on January 26th each year, the day has evolved over time to become a symbol of national identity, cultural diversity, and unity. However, the celebration of Australia Day is not without controversy, as it also represents a painful history for Indigenous Australians.

The roots of Australia Day trace back to Captain Arthur Phillip's landing at Port Jackson, marking the establishment of the first European settlement in Australia. On January 26, 1788, British convicts, marines, and officials arrived on the shores of what would later become Sydney, New South Wales. This event laid the foundation for the colonization of the continent, leading to the formation of the nation we now know as Australia.

For many Australians, Australia Day is a time to reflect on the nation's achievements, cultural richness, and shared history. The day is marked by various festivities, including parades, fireworks, concerts, and community events held across the country. It is an opportunity for Australians to come together, express national pride, and celebrate the values that define their society.

One of the key elements of Australia Day celebrations is the recognition of outstanding contributions to the community through the Australian of the Year Awards. These awards acknowledge individuals who have excelled in various fields, including science, sports, arts, and community service. The recipients serve as inspirational figures and embody the spirit of the nation.

While Australia Day is widely celebrated, its date has become a topic of controversy and debate. For some, January 26th symbolizes the birth of modern Australia, a day to commemorate the nation's foundation and progress. However, for Indigenous Australians, the date represents the beginning of a painful chapter in their history – the dispossession of their lands, the disruption of their cultures, and the devastating impacts of colonization.

Many Indigenous Australians refer to January 26th as "Invasion Day" or "Survival Day," highlighting the negative impacts of European settlement on their communities. The celebration of Australia Day on this date is seen by some as insensitive and offensive, as it marks the beginning of a period of dispossession, violence, and discrimination against the continent's original inhabitants.

In recent years, there has been a growing movement advocating for a change in the date of Australia Day. Calls to move the celebration to a more inclusive date that recognizes the shared history of Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians have gained momentum. Proponents argue that a new date would better reflect the values of reconciliation, respect, and unity.

The debate over the date of Australia Day has sparked conversations about the nation's identity and the need for a more comprehensive understanding of its history. Some argue that changing the date would be a positive step towards acknowledging the trauma and injustices experienced by Indigenous Australians and fostering a sense of national unity.

Opponents of changing the date argue that Australia Day should be seen as an opportunity for reflection and dialogue rather than a divisive issue. They suggest that by engaging in open conversations about the historical impact of colonization, Australians can work towards a shared understanding and a more inclusive national identity.

In response to the controversy surrounding Australia Day, some local governments and organizations have chosen to approach the celebration in a more inclusive manner. Events and activities that recognize Indigenous cultures, histories, and contributions are incorporated into the festivities. This approach aims to promote understanding and respect for the diverse heritage of Australia.

Efforts have also been made to develop a broader narrative surrounding Australia Day that encompasses both the achievements and challenges faced by the nation. By acknowledging the complexity of the country's history, Australians can strive to create a more inclusive and equitable society.

Ultimately, the debate over the date of Australia Day reflects the ongoing journey towards reconciliation and a deeper understanding of the nation's history. While the celebration of January 26th remains a contentious issue, it has also become a catalyst for important conversations about the need for acknowledgment, truth-telling, and healing.

As Australia continues to grapple with the complexities of its past, the discussion surrounding Australia Day serves as a reminder of the ongoing commitment required to build a more inclusive and respectful society. Whether the date of Australia Day changes in the future or not, the conversations it has sparked have already played a significant role in shaping the nation's ongoing narrative.

 

 

 

Version 2

Australia Day, celebrated annually on January 26th, holds a significant place in the hearts of Australians. This date marks the anniversary of the arrival of the First Fleet in 1788, led by Captain Arthur Phillip, at Sydney Cove. While Australia Day is often a time for national pride, festivities, and reflection on the country's history, it is not without controversy.

The origins of Australia Day can be traced back to the early years of European settlement in Australia. On January 26, 1788, Captain Arthur Phillip, the first Governor of New South Wales, raised the British flag at Sydney Cove, officially establishing the first European settlement on the continent. The day was initially known as "Foundation Day" and was celebrated with various events, including horse races and feasts.

For many years, the celebration of Australia Day was confined to New South Wales, and it wasn't until 1818 that the other Australian colonies began to mark the day with official ceremonies. Over time, the day became known as Australia Day, and by the 1930s, it was recognized as a national public holiday.

Australia Day is marked by a range of events and activities across the country. These include citizenship ceremonies, community barbecues, fireworks displays, concerts, and various sporting events. The day is an opportunity for Australians to come together, celebrate their shared identity, and reflect on the achievements of the nation.

However, the celebration of Australia Day is not without controversy, and the date has become a focal point for discussions about the nation's history and its impact on Indigenous Australians. For many Indigenous people, January 26th is not a day of celebration but a day of mourning, as it represents the beginning of European colonization, dispossession, and the loss of their traditional lands.

Proponents of changing the date argue that it is inappropriate to celebrate a day that symbolizes the suffering and dispossession of Indigenous Australians. They suggest that moving the date could help create a more inclusive and respectful national day that acknowledges the diverse history and cultures of Australia.

Opponents of changing the date often argue that Australia Day is about celebrating the nation's achievements and unity. They contend that changing the date would not address the underlying issues faced by Indigenous Australians and that a more constructive approach would be to focus on reconciliation and addressing social and economic inequalities.

The debate over the date of Australia Day has gained momentum in recent years, with calls for change becoming more prominent. Some local councils and community organizations have chosen to celebrate the day on alternative dates or in a more culturally sensitive manner, recognizing the need for a more inclusive approach to the national day.

In response to the growing debate, the Australian government has taken steps to promote a more inclusive and respectful celebration of Australia Day. Initiatives have been introduced to highlight Indigenous cultures and histories, acknowledging the impact of European colonization on Australia's First Nations people.

While the date of Australia Day remains a contentious issue, it has sparked important conversations about the nation's history, identity, and the ongoing challenges faced by Indigenous Australians. The debate reflects a broader global trend of reevaluating historical commemorations and considering their impact on different communities.

It is essential for Australians to engage in open and respectful dialogue about the significance of Australia Day and its potential to foster unity and understanding. Finding a common ground that respects the diverse perspectives within the nation is crucial for shaping a national day that reflects the values of reconciliation, inclusivity, and respect for all Australians.

In conclusion, Australia Day holds a complex and multifaceted significance for the nation. While it is a day of celebration for many Australians, it also serves as a reminder of the historical injustices faced by Indigenous Australians. The ongoing debate over the date of Australia Day underscores the importance of acknowledging and addressing the diverse perspectives within the country, fostering a sense of unity, and working towards a more inclusive and respectful national celebration.

 

  

Version 3

Australia Day is a significant national celebration that takes place annually on January 26th. The day marks the anniversary of the arrival of the First Fleet in 1788, which led to the establishment of the first European settlement in Australia. While it is a day of festivities, barbecues, and various events, Australia Day is not without controversy, as it has become the focal point of discussions surrounding the country's colonial history and its impact on Indigenous Australians.

The roots of Australia Day can be traced back to Captain Arthur Phillip's landing at Sydney Cove on January 26, 1788. The arrival of the First Fleet, which consisted of 11 ships carrying convicts, marines, and officers from Britain, marked the beginning of European colonization in Australia. The day is often seen as the foundation of the modern Australian nation, as it symbolizes the establishment of the first European settlement in the continent.

Over the years, Australia Day has evolved into a national holiday celebrated with various events and activities across the country. These include citizenship ceremonies, community barbecues, parades, concerts, and fireworks. The day is an opportunity for Australians to come together and celebrate their diverse culture, heritage, and national identity.

However, the celebration of Australia Day has become a source of controversy and debate. For many Indigenous Australians, January 26th is a day of mourning rather than celebration. They refer to it as "Invasion Day" or "Survival Day," highlighting the negative impact that European colonization had on their communities. The arrival of the First Fleet marked the beginning of dispossession, violence, and the loss of traditional lands for Indigenous peoples.

The debate surrounding the date of Australia Day intensified in recent years, with calls to change the date gaining momentum. Advocates for change argue that celebrating the arrival of the First Fleet on January 26th is insensitive to Indigenous Australians and perpetuates a historical narrative that overlooks the suffering and injustices they have endured. They propose moving the date to a more inclusive day that unifies all Australians and acknowledges the complex history of the country.

On the other hand, there are those who argue in favor of retaining January 26th as Australia Day. They believe that changing the date would not address the underlying issues facing Indigenous communities and that it is essential to confront and reconcile with the historical injustices rather than simply changing a symbolic date. Some argue that Australia Day should be seen as an opportunity for reflection and dialogue on the nation's history, acknowledging both the achievements and challenges faced by all Australians.

The controversy surrounding Australia Day has led to a range of responses from different levels of government, communities, and individuals. Some local councils have chosen not to hold celebrations on January 26th, while others have opted for more inclusive events that recognize the diversity of the Australian population. Indigenous-led events, such as the Yabun Festival in Sydney, provide an alternative space for celebrating Indigenous culture and resilience on Australia Day.

In response to the ongoing debate, the Australian government has expressed a commitment to promoting national unity and understanding. The government encourages a respectful and inclusive approach to Australia Day celebrations, acknowledging the diversity of perspectives on the issue. Despite this, the question of changing the date remains a divisive and complex topic that reflects deeper issues related to Australia's historical legacy and the ongoing challenges faced by Indigenous communities.

In recent years, the conversation around Australia Day has extended beyond the date itself to encompass broader issues of reconciliation, constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians, and addressing socio-economic disparities. The debate serves as a reminder of the need for ongoing dialogue and understanding to build a more inclusive and reconciled nation.

While Australia Day continues to be a day of festivities and national pride for many, the controversy surrounding its date underscores the importance of acknowledging and addressing the historical injustices that have shaped the nation. The conversation around Australia Day reflects a broader societal discourse on reconciliation, identity, and the shared responsibility of all Australians to confront the complexities of their history and work towards a more inclusive and equitable future.

 

 

Version 4

Australia Day is a significant national celebration that marks the anniversary of the arrival of the First Fleet at Sydney Cove in 1788. Observed annually on January 26th, the day holds different meanings for various Australians. While it is a day of festivities, barbecues, and national pride for many, it also sparks debates and discussions about the historical context surrounding this date. This essay will delve into the origins of Australia Day, its evolution over the years, and the contemporary debates that surround it.

The roots of Australia Day can be traced back to the early years of European settlement in Australia. On January 26, 1788, Captain Arthur Phillip, along with a fleet of 11 ships, landed at Port Jackson in New South Wales, marking the beginning of British colonization. The day is often considered the birth of modern Australia, as it marked the establishment of the first European settlement on the continent. Initially, the anniversary was celebrated as Foundation Day, with events like horse races and feasts, but the concept of a national day of celebration took time to develop.

In the 19th century, Australia Day became more widely recognized and celebrated. However, it wasn't until the late 1930s that January 26th was consistently observed as a national public holiday. Over the years, the celebration of Australia Day has evolved, incorporating various traditions and activities that reflect the country's diverse cultural heritage. Fireworks displays, citizenship ceremonies, barbecues, and community events have become integral parts of the day, bringing people together to celebrate the nation's achievements and identity.

While Australia Day has been a day of national pride for many, it has also become a source of controversy and debate. Indigenous Australians, the original inhabitants of the continent, often view January 26th as a day of mourning rather than celebration. For them, it symbolizes the beginning of colonization, dispossession, and the devastating impact on their cultures and communities. Many Indigenous Australians refer to the day as "Invasion Day" or "Survival Day" and advocate for a change in the date of the national celebration.

The debate surrounding the date of Australia Day intensified in the 21st century, with growing calls to change it to a more inclusive date that respects the history and perspectives of all Australians. Proponents of changing the date argue that celebrating on a day that marks the dispossession and suffering of Indigenous peoples is insensitive and perpetuates historical injustices. They suggest alternative dates, such as January 1st (when Australia became a federated nation in 1901) or May 8th (when the Mabo decision recognized Indigenous land rights), as more suitable options for a national day.

On the other hand, defenders of the current date argue that changing it would not address the underlying issues faced by Indigenous Australians. They contend that Australia Day should be seen as an opportunity for reflection, education, and dialogue rather than abandoning the traditions associated with the current date. Some argue that the celebration could be transformed into a more inclusive day that acknowledges both the achievements of modern Australia and the historical complexities that shaped the nation.

The debate over Australia Day's date has gained momentum in recent years, leading to increased awareness and discussions about the country's colonial history and its impact on Indigenous communities. Governments at various levels have grappled with the issue, and some local councils have chosen not to hold Australia Day events on January 26th out of respect for Indigenous sensitivities.

In response to the growing debate, the National Australia Day Council, which coordinates the official Australia Day celebrations, emphasizes the need for unity and understanding. They encourage Australians to recognize the different perspectives on the date and engage in respectful conversations about the nation's history. The council acknowledges the pain experienced by Indigenous Australians and emphasizes the importance of reconciliation and building a shared understanding of the country's past.

Public opinion on the matter remains diverse, reflecting the broader societal discussions on identity, history, and reconciliation. While some Australians strongly advocate for changing the date to foster a more inclusive national celebration, others fear that altering traditions could lead to a division within the community. Striking a balance between acknowledging the historical challenges faced by Indigenous Australians and maintaining a sense of national unity poses a complex challenge for policymakers and the broader Australian society.

In conclusion, Australia Day is a multifaceted celebration that encapsulates the nation's history, achievements, and ongoing debates about identity and reconciliation. While January 26th marks the arrival of the First Fleet and the establishment of European settlement, it is also a date that brings to the forefront the pain and suffering experienced by Indigenous Australians. The ongoing debate about changing the date reflects a broader conversation about acknowledging the past, fostering inclusivity, and building a shared national identity. As Australia continues to grapple with these issues, the future of Australia Day remains an evolving and dynamic aspect of the nation's cultural landscape.

 

These are so suitably bland and middle-of-the-road that it might have been written for a government brochure to recent migrants.

Some years ago I wrote an article on the same subject. It's quite different.  Read it here...

No comments

Travel

Israel

 

 

 

 

 

2024 Addendum

 

It's shocking that another Addendum to this article is necessary.

Yet, we are no nearer to a peaceful resolution like the, internationally called for, 'Two state solution', or some workable version thereof.

Indeed, the situation, particularly for Palestinians, has gone from bad to worse.

At the same time, Israeli losses are mounting as the war drags on.  Yet, Hamas remains undefeated and Bibi remains recalcitrant.

Comments:

 On Wed, 4 Sep 2024, at 1:23 PM, Barry Cross wrote:
> There seems to be no resolution to the problem of the disputed land of Israel. You consider Gaza to have been put under siege, but I wonder if that and the other Israeli acts you mention are themselves responses to a response by them of being under siege, or at least being seriously threatened, by hostile forces who do not recognise the legitimacy of the state of Israel? Hamas’s claim and stated intention of establishing a Palestinian state “from the river to the sea” and periodic acts of aggression need to be taken into account I suggest, when judging the actions of the Israeli’s. In addition, there is the menace coming from Iranian proxies in Southern Lebanon and Yemen, and from Iran itself.
>
> Whatever the merits of the respective claims to the contended territory might be, it seems reasonable to accept that Israeli’s to consider they are a constant threat to their very survival. Naturally, this must influence their actions, particularly in response to the many acts of aggression they have been subjected to over many decades. By way of contrast, how lucky are we!
>
> These are my off the cuff comments for what they are worth.
>
> Regards
> Barry Cross
>
> Sent from my iPhone

 

 

 

2023 Addendum

 

It's a decade since this visit to Israel in September 2014.

From July until just a month before we arrived, Israeli troops had been conducting an 'operation' against Hamas in the Gaza strip, in the course of which 469 Israeli soldiers lost their lives.  The country was still reeling. 

17,200 Garzan homes were totally destroyed and three times that number were seriously damaged.  An estimated 2,000 (who keeps count) civilians died in the destruction.  'Bibi' Netanyahu, who had ordered the Operation, declared it a victory.

This time it's on a grander scale: a 'War', and Bibi has vowed to wipe-out Hamas.

Pundits have been moved to speculate on the Hamas strategy, that was obviously premeditated. In addition to taking hostages, it involving sickening brutality against obvious innocents, with many of the worst images made and published by themselves. 

It seemed to be deliberate provocation, with a highly predictable outcome.

Martyrdom?  

Historically, Hamas have done Bibi no harm.  See: 'For years, Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now it’s blown up in our faces' in the Israel Times.

Thinking about our visit, I've been moved to wonder how many of today's terrorists were children a decade ago?  How many saw their loved ones: buried alive; blown apart; maimed for life; then dismissed by Bibi as: 'collateral damage'? 

And how many of the children, now stumbling in the rubble, will, in their turn, become terrorists against the hated oppressor across the barrier?

Is Bibi's present purge a good strategy for assuring future harmony?

I commend my decade old analysis to you: A Brief Modern History and Is there a solution?

Comments: 
Since posting the above I've been sent the following article, implicating religious belief, with which I substantially agree, save for its disregarding the Jewish fundamentalists'/extremists' complicity; amplifying the present horrors: The Bright Line Between Good and Evil 

Another reader has provided a link to a perspective similar to my own by Australian 'Elder Statesman' John MenadueHamas, Gaza and the continuing Zionist project.  His Pearls and Irritations site provides a number of articles relating to the current Gaza situation. Worth a read.

The Economist has since reported and unusual spate of short-selling immediately preceding the attacks: Who made millions trading the October 7th attacks?  

Money-making by someone in the know? If so, it's beyond evil.

 

 

A Little Background

The land between the Jordan river and the Mediterranean Sea, known as Palestine, is one of the most fought over in human history.  Anthropologists believe that the first humans to leave Africa lived in and around this region and that all non-African humans are related to these common ancestors who lived perhaps 70,000 years ago.  At first glance this interest seems odd, because as bits of territory go it's nothing special.  These days it's mostly desert and semi-desert.  Somewhere back-o-Bourke might look similar, if a bit redder. 

Yet since humans have kept written records, Egyptians, Canaanites, Philistines, Ancient Israelites, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Byzantines, early Muslims, Christian Crusaders, Ottomans (and other later Muslims), British and Zionists, have all fought to control this land.  This has sometimes been for strategic reasons alone but often partly for affairs of the heart, because this land is steeped in history and myth. 

Read more: Israel

Fiction, Recollections & News

Napoleon - the movie

 

As holiday entertainment goes, one could do worse than spend two-and-a-half hours (157 minutes) with Napoleon.

Wikipedia tells us: "Napoleon is a 2023 epic historical drama film directed and produced by Ridley Scott and written by David Scarpa. Based on the story of Napoleon Bonaparte, primarily depicting the French leader's rise to power as well as his relationship with his [first} wife, Joséphine, the film stars Joaquin Phoenix as Napoleon and Vanessa Kirby as Joséphine."

The many battle scenes are spectacular and have been praised for their accuracy.

Read more: Napoleon - the movie

Opinions and Philosophy

Holden - The Demise of an Iconic Brand

 

I drive a Holden. 

It’s my second. The first was a shiny black Commodore.  A V6 Lumina edition.

I have owned well over a dozen cars and driven a lot more, in numerous countries, but these are my first from General Motors.

The new one is a white Calais Sportswagon and it's the best car I've ever owned.

Based on the German Opel, it has traction control conferring impeccable braking and steering and ample power and acceleration even with four adults and luggage.  Add to that: leather seats; climate control; head-up display; voice commands for entertainment, phone and so on; and it's a luxurious ride.

Yet I’m starting to think that I can put an end to any car brand, just by buying one.

Holden finally ceased manufacturing in Australia just after my present model rolled off the production line.

Read more: Holden - The Demise of an Iconic Brand

Terms of Use

Terms of Use                                                                    Copyright