Who is Online

We have 124 guests and no members online

A facebook friend has sent me this link 'Want to Know Julian Assange’s Endgame? He Told You a Decade Ago' (by Andy Greenberg, that appeared in WIRED in Oct 2016) and I couldn't resist bringing it to your attention.

To read it click on this image from the article:

 Assange t
Image (cropped): MARK CHEW/FAIRFAX MEDIA/GETTY IMAGES

 

Assange is an Australian who has already featured in several articles on this website:

 

As a founder of WikiLeaks Julian Assange has been seen as a prominent supporter of journalistic and personal freedom. He's has won many awards on these grounds and attracted support from many politicians and public figures, mainly associated with the political left.   On the other hand in the US he has been described as a cyber-terrorist and is alleged to be the subject of a 'sealed indictment' relating to a secret Grand Jury.  Perhaps in consequence of this he has attracted considerable support in Russia, including hosting a television show on Russia Today, Russia's English language news service.

He has now been holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London since August 2012, where he sought asylum after jumping bail imposed by a British court relating to extradition to Sweden to answer rape allegations. During this time the British public have spent over £13 million to keep him there.  As a result he has become a major celebrity.

Current allegations against him in the US relate to WikiLeaks exhibiting bias against Hillary Clinton in the recent US Presidential election by publishing her secret emails and those of others in her group while not doing the same to Trump or the Republicans.  It is alleged that these damaging documents were passed to WikiLeaks by state sponsored Russian hackers.  In his defence Assange admits to disliking Clinton and making disparaging remarks, particularly relating to disastrous US involvement in the Middle East during her period as Secretary of State, but claims to dislike Trump too, saying the choice was between 'cholera and gonorrhoea'.

Julian Assange is obviously very bright.

According to Wikipedia, when he was 20 years old and living in Melbourne, Assange was discovered to be a notorious computer hacker.  After being caught he was recruited by the authorities and began assisting the Victoria Police Child Exploitation Unit to catch paedophiles.  When his case was eventually heard in 1994 he pleaded guilty to twenty-five charges of hacking and related crimes, was ordered to pay reparations of A$2,100 and was released on a good behaviour bond.  Leniency was granted due to the absence of malicious or mercenary intent and because of his disrupted childhood. For more details go to his Wikipedia entry: Here...

By 1994 Assange was already gaining a reputation as an expert on cyber-security. While he was assisting corporations tighten up their cyber-security and writing encryption tools he seems to have began to crystallise rather contrary ideas about the evils of such secrecy.  These ideas are set out in his 2006 paper Conspiracy as Governance, published soon after WikiLeaks was established.

This paper is revealing and I argued in Six degrees of separation, conspiracy and wealth that his views about conspiracy are akin to extreme market economics, more Ayn Rand than Karl Marx. 

Maybe that's why they like him in today's Russia?  Or is it that the enemy of my enemy is my friend?

These contradictions make Julian Assange one of the more interesting celebrities of our age.  So do we know his endgame?  I don't think even he knows that!

I can't wait for the next instalment. 

 

No comments

Travel

Morocco

 

 

 

In August 2008 we visited Morocco; before going to Spain and Portugal.  We flew into Marrakesh from Malta and then used the train via Casablanca to Fez; before train-travelling further north to Tangiers.

Read more: Morocco

Fiction, Recollections & News

The Meaning of Death

 

 

 

 

 

 

'I was recently restored to life after being dead for several hours' 

The truth of this statement depends on the changing and surprisingly imprecise meaning of the word: 'dead'. 

Until the middle of last century a medical person may well have declared me dead.  I was definitely dead by the rules of the day.  I lacked most of the essential 'vital signs' of a living person and the technology that sustained me in their absence was not yet perfected. 

I was no longer breathing; I had no heartbeat; I was limp and unconscious; and I failed to respond to stimuli, like being cut open (as in a post mortem examination) and having my heart sliced into.  Until the middle of the 20th century the next course would have been to call an undertaker; say some comforting words then dispose of my corpse: perhaps at sea if I was travelling (that might be nice); or it in a box in the ground; or by feeding my low-ash coffin into a furnace then collect the dust to deposit or scatter somewhere.

But today we set little store by a pulse or breathing as arbiters of life.  No more listening for a heartbeat or holding a feather to the nose. Now we need to know about the state of the brain and central nervous system.  According to the BMA: '{death} is generally taken to mean the irreversible loss of capacity for consciousness combined with the irreversible loss of capacity to breathe'.  In other words, returning from death depends on the potential of our brain and central nervous system to recover from whatever trauma or disease assails us.

Read more: The Meaning of Death

Opinions and Philosophy

Gone but not forgotten

Gone but not forgotten

 

 

Gough Whitlam has died at the age of 98.

I had an early encounter with him electioneering in western Sydney when he was newly in opposition, soon after he had usurped Cocky (Arthur) Calwell as leader of the Parliamentary Labor Party and was still hated by elements of his own party.

I liked Cocky too.  He'd addressed us at University once, revealing that he hid his considerable intellectual light under a barrel.  He was an able man but in the Labor Party of the day to seem too smart or well spoken (like that bastard Menzies) was believed to be a handicap, hence his 'rough diamond' persona.

Gough was a new breed: smooth, well presented and intellectually arrogant.  He had quite a fight on his hands to gain and retain leadership.  And he used his eventual victory over the Party's 'faceless men' to persuade the Country that he was altogether a new broom. 

It was time for a change not just for the Labor Party but for Australia.

Read more: Gone but not forgotten

Terms of Use

Terms of Use                                                                    Copyright