Who is Online

We have 131 guests and no members online

There is an obvious sub-text to my short story: The Secret, that I wrote in 2015 after a trip to Russia. Silly things, we might come to believe in, like 'the law of attraction' are not harmless. 

The story is also a reflection on the difference between American and Australian stereotypes, that were evident from conversations on the cruise.

I lived in New York for some time and my eldest daughter was born there. I have visited the US fairly regularly since. It is, in many ways, the closest country to Australia that you will find, outside New Zealand.  So, I have often been surprised by how different it is in other ways to Australia, given the great similarities in the median standard of living, shared popular culture and immigrant demographics.

I have come to the conclusion that this stems from our different founding origins.

Starting as a penal colony from which convicts could be emancipated and 'make good', Australians are surprised and gratified when things turn out well and put this down to good luck (The Lucky Country).  As a result, Australians share a national inferiority complex and are always checking to see how they stack-up overseas.  There is no 'true path', you just get on with it and do what works. You don't go off, trying to take-over the world or telling others how to run their country - unless we are backing-up our big cousin across the Pacific.

America started as the 'Promised Land'. Unlike Australia they had a founding myth and fought Britain for their independence.  Then they fought with Britain again in 1812, Mr Maddison's War, in an attempt to annex Canada. In 1836 they fought with Mexico to successfully annex Texas. Then, between 1861 and 1865, they fought amongst themselves, over sovereignty over Texas and the southern states; and to preserve slavery in the South. Then they fought with the Spanish again 1898 to 'free' Cuba, Hispaniola and the Philippines. 

Meanwhile, they purchased vast tracts from France and Russia and fought pitched battles with their own indigenous peoples. Latterly they plotted with revolutionaries, of all ilk's, to overthrow numerous other Colonial powers and governments, to whom they were antipathetic for one or another reason. For more on this see: Overthrow and the 'Arab Spring' on this website.

Stereotypically, Americans, as a people, believe in their country's Manifest Destiny. That is, like Pangloss, that 'American Democracy' is the best of all systems of government and will, or is destined to result in, eventually, the best of all possible worlds. Thus, it needs to be spread far-and-wide, if all people are to have good, peaceful and happy lives.  

This belief in themselves as do-gooders is reinforced by the highest level of religiosity of any developed nation. They are shocked, and almost disbelieving, when things don't go well.  As a result, they are often their own harshest critics, believing that problems arise because they are straying from the true path, even though they usually disagree about what that is.

Australians, stereotypically, have no such vision or belief, beyond a general sense of belonging to 'Team Australia' and an egalitarian feeling that everyone ought to have equal opportunity; or at least to have a say in how we are governed. Hence, it is compulsory to vote in Australia. And we don't like people breaking the duly enacted laws of our society. Because, despite our 'larrikin self-image', we are among the most compliant, law-abiding populations on the planet.   

Yet, generally speaking, we wouldn't want to enforce our system on anybody else.  Not even on Papua New Guinea, for which we once held responsibility: "There it is mate, our form of government, take it or leave it."

As a gross generalisation, Australians tend to be prepared to take others as they find them and, maybe, learn from them. Americans are often evangelical when it comes to their form of democracy and the: American Dream. Thus, Australians are noticeably better received by the locals in foreign lands and, possibly foolishly, regard everyone as a potential friend, whereas Americans tend to be more wary.

These are stereotypes and stereotypes always have exceptions, like the older American couple who attended the Opera with us; who, like us, clearly took the Russians at face value.  

There were several other nationality groups on the same boat, each exhibiting stereotypical behaviour.  Possibly people adopt their national stereotype when attempting to bond with, otherwise unknown, fellow countrymen in a strange environment.

As to the US settings in my story:

Despite the recent spate of highly publicised school murders, the US is becoming much safer. The homicide rate has declined substantially from 9.8 in 1992 to 4.8 per 100,000 persons now.  

By comparison the rate in Australia is 1.2 per 100,000 and the homicide rate in Moscow in 2009 was 4.6 per 100,000 but lower across the nation.  

The last time I visited Lancing and Detroit was nearly 40 years ago.  Detroit was where the guy I was meeting on business insisted he send his security guard with me when, on leaving, I told him I had parked the rental car in the public car park across the street.  As we approached the building the guard un-clipped his holster and half drew his gun.

So I had to do a bit of virtual revisiting via Google. There I found a YouTube tour of the Detroit Ghetto.  It remains one of the most dangerous urban places in the World and not a place to get a flat tyre.  The setting for the car-jacking was taken from that short film.  

According to Forbes in October 2013:

Make no mistake: Detroit is still a very dangerous place. The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s crime database reports Detroit had 386 murders last year, up from 344 in 2011 and essentially unchanged from 2000 – when the city had 200,000 more residents.

The steady outflow of residents has driven Detroit’s murder rate up to 54.6 per 100,000, more than 10 times the national average and the highest in the country among large cities.

Equally troubled Stockton, Calif., fifth on this year’s Most Dangerous list, has less than half the murder rate of Detroit.

This compares to 8.4 murders per 100,000 for Mexico City.  Mind you, both Wendy and I wandered about in Mexico City and saw nothing but surprisingly happy people enjoying themselves or going about their business.

Unemployment in the US is presently very high by Australian standards and many professionals are doing it tough.

The relative pay difference between bar work and journalism in the US was recently illustrated in a documentary aired in Australia on the ABC's Foreign Correspondent.

As far as I can tell using Google there is no bar in Chicago called 'Bree's Bar'. I made it up. But the hotel in Paris, later on, is real - and very nice.

Russian elements are from direct experience. You can read about them on this website.

By the way, just as you can safely tour Detroit in Google Street View, you can do the same in Moscow and many other Russian cities. You might be surprised.

RM

24 October 2013

 

 

 

 

No comments

Travel

India

October 2009

 

 

 

 

In summary

 

India was amazing. It was just as I had been told, read, seen on TV and so on but quite different to what I expected; a physical experience (noise, reactions of and interactions with people, smells and other sensations) rather than an intellectual appreciation.

Read more: India

Fiction, Recollections & News

A Digger’s Tale

- Introduction

 

 

The accompanying story is ‘warts and all’.  It is the actual memoirs (hand written and transcribed here; but with my headings added) of Corporal Ross Smith, a young Australian man, 18 years of age, from humble circumstances [read more...] who was drawn by World events into the Second World War.  He tells it as he saw it.  The action takes place near Rabaul in New Britain. 

Read more: A Digger’s Tale

Opinions and Philosophy

A Dismal Science

 

 

Thomas Carlyle coined this epithet in 1839 while criticising  Malthus, who warned of what subsequently happened, exploding population.

According to Carlyle his economic theories: "are indeed sufficiently mournful. Dreary, stolid, dismal, without hope for this world or the next" and in 1894 he described economics as: 'quite abject and distressing... dismal science... led by the sacred cause of Black Emancipation.'  The label has stuck ever since.

This 'dismal' reputation has not been helped by repeated economic recessions and a Great Depression, together with continuously erroneous forecasts and contradictory solutions fuelled by opposing theories.  

This article reviews some of those competing paradigms and their effect on the economic progress of Australia.

Read more: A Dismal Science

Terms of Use

Terms of Use                                                                    Copyright