Who is Online

We have 241 guests and no members online

JORDAN BAKER 1977 -

 

In one respect, my rules seem much stricter than those of my mother, grandmother and great-grandmother.  There seems to be much more crime and danger in modern society, and my rules reflect this.  I am not allowed to walk by myself or catch the train in the dark, to go into the city alone, or to go out without telling my parents where I am going, who I am going with, what I will do there, how I will get there, and when I will be home.  These rules didn't seem as important in the past, in times when crime rates were lower and the streets safer.

Chores now are a lot easier than those in my grandmother’s and great- grandmother's childhood. 

We have modern appliances that do the work in half the time and with 10% of the trouble, whereas my great-grandmother didn't even have electricity.  My chores only consist of making my bed, tidying my room and unpacking the dishwasher.

Girls in my generation are not prohibited in any way from seeing boys.  Rather, it is unusual if a girl doesn't socialise with boys on a regular basis before her late teens.  Parents now could not attempt to segregate the sexes or forbid them from seeing each other; it happens too casually and too frequently for this to be practical.

Expectations of women have changed a lot from my great-grandmothers and grandmother's time.  Then women would only ever work until they were married.  They would seldom have tertiary or even secondary education, which were seen as unnecessary for a woman, as she would only be keeping house and raising the children.  Now, it is just as common for a woman to have university qualifications and an influential, powerful job as it is for men.  Now, women don’t just work to fill in time between school and marriage.  They work because they know they have the talent and potential to be what they want to be, not just a housewife.  Women are not only accepted, but expected to do well and achieve. 

Libraries offer a far wider range of books now than they have ever done before.  The subjects of books have become far more explicit and varied, so should parents wish to do so, there is more need for reading and viewing censorship and restrictions for children than at any time in the past.  Until only a few years ago my parents were very strict about my viewing, and many shows were considered unsuitable by them.  However my reading has not been restricted so much, partly because from an early age my mother has guided me along the paths that she followed as a girl, so I grew up preferring "Pollyanna" to "Forever".  As a teenager, censorship for me is decreasing, rather than increasing as it did for my mother's, grandmother's and great grandmother's adolescence.  My parent's view is that as I mature, I am more able to handle more sensitive issues. 

There has never been a fashion revolution quite like the one in the 60’s since then.  Fashions for young people today are relaxed and easy; jeans, jumpers, shorts and T shirts.  Skirts are becoming shorter, and clothes are becoming more daring. 

There is a great contrast between the fashions prescribed for my grandmother and great-grandmother and those which I wear.  Then it was shocking for dresses to be knee-length, now it is common for them to be halfway up the thighs.  (However, we teenagers of the 90's cannot compete with the shortness of the skirts worn by our mothers in the 60' sand 70’s, when skirts barely covered the backside.)  Then it was unusual for women to wear trousers, now more women wear them than shorts.  However even in the seventies, my mother was forbidden to wear trousers to work.  Then women wore hats, gloves and suspender belts; now few women even own any of these articles. 

The biggest change that has occurred between my great-grandmother's youth and mine is technology.  Then, they didn't even have electricity.  Now, they have everything from microwave ovens to mobile 'phones to live satellites.  The nature of the people has not really changed; this is demonstrated by three generations all devouring prohibited reading.  It is just the circumstances that are really different. 

 

THANK YOU TO;

Molly Ellson
Joan Smith
Wendy Baker

 

No comments

Travel

Denmark

 

 

  

 

 

In the seventies I spent some time travelling around Denmark visiting geographically diverse relatives but in a couple of days there was no time to repeat that, so this was to be a quick trip to two places that I remembered as standing out in 1970's: Copenhagen and Roskilde.

An increasing number of Danes are my progressively distant cousins by virtue of my great aunt marrying a Dane, thus contributing my mother's grandparent's DNA to the extended family in Denmark.  As a result, these Danes are my children's cousins too.

Denmark is a relatively small but wealthy country in which people share a common language and thus similar values, like an enthusiasm for subsidising wind power and shunning nuclear energy, except as an import from Germany, Sweden and France. 

They also like all things cultural and historical and to judge by the museums and cultural activities many take pride in the Danish Vikings who were amongst those who contributed to my aforementioned DNA, way back.  My Danish great uncle liked to listen to Geordies on the buses in Newcastle speaking Tyneside, as he discovered many words in common with Danish thanks to those Danes who had settled in the Tyne valley.

Nevertheless, compared to Australia or the US or even many other European countries, Denmark is remarkably monocultural. A social scientist I listened to last year made the point that the sense of community, that a single language and culture confers, creates a sense of extended family.  This allows the Scandinavian countries to maintain very generous social welfare, supported by some of the highest tax rates in the world, yet to be sufficiently productive and hence consumptive per capita, to maintain among the highest material standards of living in the world. 

Read more: Denmark

Fiction, Recollections & News

Australia in the 1930s

 

 

These recollections are by Ross Smith, written when he was only 86 years old; the same young man who subsequently went to war in New Britain; as related elsewhere on this website [read more...].  We learn about the development of the skills that later saved his life and those of others in his platoon.  We also get a sense of what it was to be poor in pre-war Australia; and the continuity of that experience from the earlier convict and pioneering days from which our Australia grew.                   *

Read more: Australia in the 1930s

Opinions and Philosophy

The Last Carbon Taxer

- a Recent Wall Street Journal article

 

 

A recent wall street journal article 'The Last Carbon Taxer' has 'gone viral' and is now making the email rounds  click here...  to see a copy on this site.  The following comments are also interesting; reflecting both sides of the present debate in Australia.

As the subject article points out, contrary to present assertions, a domestic carbon tax in Australia will neither do much to reduce the carbon impact on world climate, if implemented, nor make a significant contribution, if not implemented. 

Read more: The Last Carbon Taxer

Terms of Use

Terms of Use                                                                    Copyright