Who is Online

We have 209 guests and no members online


Conclusion

 

Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today...

 

 

There is absolutely no evidence of the existence of a life after death but there is a great deal of evidence that this belief is inherent in the human psyche, has utility to some powerful interests, is profoundly hoped for by many and is widely incorporated into our myths for these reasons. 

Recent discoveries about the nature of a universe and about the human brain confirm the extreme improbability of the existence of a heaven, hell, purgatory, a soul or any continued life after death.

Just as there is no need for me to imagine that you are reading this; there is no need to imagine that there is no heaven, or hell; it is as certain as the existence of others in my universe; and from your perspective, this essay in yours.

The belief in a life after death is viewed in most secular western societies as a harmless cultural trifle that goes along with social church attendance. 

But in some parts of the world and some western sub-cultures it has a serious impact on the lives of people who: live in poverty but spend valuable time, effort and what little money they have attempting to secure their immortal soul; become the victims of religious charlatans or cults; or sacrifice their lives and those of others in religious vendettas and terrorist bombings.  And it is an unconscionable, obscene idea to advance or promulgate if it causes even one elderly or sick person to spend their last days in trembling fear of divine judgement or everlasting punishment.

The related ideas that a foetus has a soul, even before the development of a nervous system; or that only God should control conception, are also problematic as they are significant impediments to controlling overpopulation. 

Overpopulation is the greatest crisis presently facing humanity.  This crisis has been significantly exacerbated by religiously, and sometimes marketing, motivated sabotage to efforts to stop or slow population growth during the twentieth century.  Overpopulation is now directly responsible for an estimated 25 to 40 people dying prematurely and agonisingly every minute, from widespread malnutrition and social breakdown in Africa and parts of Asia and South America.  In a substantial part of the world, half the population is now under the age of 15, hardly conducive to social stability, productivity or good government; and in many one in five people die unpleasantly before reaching even this age.  These deaths have long been predicted if population was not controlled, by scientists working in the field and bodies like the United Nations that set up the UN Population Fund in 1969. But the Vatican took an overt stand against the 1974 World Population Year and started a campaign to propagate its viewpoint on birth control; rejecting contraceptives, sterilisation and abortion.  The official Catholic policy was to influence, through Catholic political power, the policy of nations ‘even where Catholics represent a minority of the population’.  At the same time Muslim fundamentalists were denying women an education and consolidating their status and baby factories for Muslim men.  It is not unreasonable to accuse those responsible for sabotage to population control and female education programmes in the early 1970’s, of premeditated mass murder in the 21st century.

We have already let ‘too much water under the bridge’ to contain this and no matter what we do now this dreadful death rate is bound to at least double.  To mitigate this we urgently need to give women the means to control their own fertility and the education needed to put this into effect.   I am still reeling from a poster opposing such measures that I saw in a church in Portugal.  If the perpetrators and promulgators of such insidious nonsense persist they will be responsible for death on a scale that will make past religiously motivated genocides and holocausts look like insignificant practice runs.  

In the developed and developing world it is overpopulation (not its symptoms such as increasing CO2 and methane levels) that is the root cause of impending anthropogenic climate change and resource depletion.  We simply can’t keep increasing population without consequence.

In these ways a belief in ‘the life eternal’ is one of the worst of the wrong ideas a person can hold.

To quote John Lennon again:

You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will live as one

 

Richard McKie
2008-2015


 

 

 

 

No comments

Travel

Southern England

 

 

 

In mid July 2016 Wendy and I took flight again to Europe.  Those who follow these travel diaries will note that part of out trip last year was cut when Wendy's mum took ill.  In particular we missed out on a planned trip to Romania and eastern Germany.  This time our British sojourn would be interrupted for a few days by a side-trip to Copenhagen and Roskilde in Denmark.

Read more: Southern England

Fiction, Recollections & News

The Wedding Party

January 29th 2011

 

See some of it on YouTube (some websites may block this)...

Read more: The Wedding Party

Opinions and Philosophy

Climate Emergency

 

 

 

emergency
/uh'merrjuhnsee, ee-/.
noun, plural emergencies.
1. an unforeseen occurrence; a sudden and urgent occasion for action.

 

 

Recent calls for action on climate change have taken to declaring that we are facing a 'Climate Emergency'.

This concerns me on a couple of levels.

The first seems obvious. There's nothing unforseen or sudden about our present predicament. 

My second concern is that 'emergency' implies something short lived.  It gives the impression that by 'fire fighting against carbon dioxide' or revolutionary action against governments, or commuters, activists can resolve the climate crisis and go back to 'normal' - whatever that is. Would it not be better to press for considered, incremental changes that might avoid the catastrophic collapse of civilisation and our collective 'human project' or at least give it a few more years sometime in the future?

Back in 1990, concluding my paper: Issues Arising from the Greenhouse Hypothesis I wrote:

We need to focus on the possible.

An appropriate response is to ensure that resource and transport efficiency is optimised and energy waste is reduced. Another is to explore less polluting energy sources. This needs to be explored more critically. Each so-called green power option should be carefully analysed for whole of life energy and greenhouse gas production, against the benchmark of present technology, before going beyond the demonstration or experimental stage.

Much more important are the cultural and technological changes needed to minimise World overpopulation. We desperately need to remove the socio-economic drivers to larger families, young motherhood and excessive personal consumption (from resource inefficiencies to long journeys to work).

Climate change may be inevitable. We should be working to climate “harden” the production of food, ensure that public infrastructure (roads, bridges, dams, hospitals, utilities and so) on are designed to accommodate change and that the places people live are not excessively vulnerable to drought, flood or storm. [I didn't mention fire]

Only by solving these problems will we have any hope of finding solutions to the other pressures human expansion is imposing on the planet. It is time to start looking for creative answers for NSW and Australia  now.

 

Read more: Climate Emergency

Terms of Use

Terms of Use                                                                    Copyright