Who is Online

We have 39 guests and no members online

 

Peak Oil - When?

 

 

According to A Crude Awakening the world may have already passed ‘peak oil’. 

This chart (like the next, from Wikipedia) shows various competing predictions of peak oil:

 

 

image006 

 

 

Critics of the Peak Oil argument point to the very large deposits remaining in tar sands and deep ocean deposits like those in the Gulf of Mexico and Timor Gap that were previously uneconomic and technically more difficult to extract. 

It can be seen that the most optimistic scenarios show peak oil disappearing off the chart.  These are based on the availability of oil from oil sands.  These reserves are believed to be very extensive.  But they’re also very expensive to extract and the process released additional carbon dioxide.  These will become increasingly profitable as the price rises and their exploitation may delay the ultimate depletion of oil, perhaps by decades.

They will do nothing to lower the cost of oil and indeed the conversion of coal to oil (discussed later) may be less expensive in money and resourced terms.

Petrol prices are going to rise. The current price (17 Feb 2008) is $ 95.69/Barrel and the one year futures forecast is for $124.40/Barrel (oil-price.net ) this compares with a low (1999 price) of just over $10. Based on the 1999 pump price, and in the absence of government intervention to keep prices low, petrol prices should already be approaching $7.00 a litre.

 

 

image008 

 

Although we will still have petrol, or a petrol substitute, for many years to come, the price will be much higher than it has been in the past.    And prices will continue to rise steadily until they reach the point at which sustainable energy becomes economic.

 

 

Impact of higher oil prices

 

 

As indicated above we are not about to run out of transport fuel anytime soon but over a third of total energy demand is for transport as shown in the following chart[3] and the price of the major source of this energy is  about to rise very substantially.  Some elements of our present transport intensive lifestyle are likely to become progressively untenable for people on average incomes.

 

 

image010  

 

 

But going back to a more 1950s transport style would not be the end of civilisation as we know it.

We will need some more ‘fast electric trains’ and even, perhaps, more trams and other mass transport. We might have to think about using ships and trains rather than planes for long distance travel.  Cities may need to become more compact to shorten journeys to work, and businesses may need to locate near to public transport.

Of course we are never going to return to the world of the 1950’s.  World population has more than doubled since then.  Women have jobs in the workforce.  Children go to pre-school. Retail is a centralised in shopping malls.  But some relatively minor changes to city planning could accommodate our city to lower car usage.  All new shopping malls could be required to locate over or near to railway stations, as many are now, with bus interchanges. 

New rail lines could be built to link existing large shopping malls and relatively dense communities.  Local resistance to new rail lines is likely to lose support.   The unfinished Bondi, Maroubra, Randwick loop and the long needed northern beaches rail line in particular, might at last be completed.  Other service industries could be encouraged to locate their businesses in and around the new rail station precincts.  Higher density residential precincts would be located within walking, or cycling, distance of railway stations. 

The overall prognosis is good.  People will walk and cycle more and children will be less often driven to school.  Roads will be less congested.  Pollution will be lower and the Blue Mountains will be blue again.  Lifestyles will be healthier and the production of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases will decline.

The higher petrol prices may come to the aid of town planners in other ways too.  Much of the sprawl of Sydney suburbia can only be serviced by car and many of these properties have almost as much real estate dedicated to cars as to human habitation.  The prices of these properties will fall relative to areas of attractive higher density housing that do not require and the constant use of motor vehicles. 

In the meantime the technology that gave us the first transistor in 1948 provided the integrated circuit in 1964 followed by the microchip microcomputer in the late 1970’s, has led to the www in the nineties, mobile phones and electronic commuting today. 

Today I can talk to somebody in the United States at the click of a button and at less cost than talking to somebody down the street.  It is not absolutely essential for me to leave home or travel to America to do much of my work.  I’m writing this by a speaking into a microphone and just correcting my text as I go with the keyboard and mouse.  In future most written text will be dictated like this. I can retrieve vast amounts of information from my desktop.

I can already use a web-camera (if I choose to) and microphone to talk face-to-face with people in other places in the world all from my chair at home.  I could, if I wished, publish this document as a blog available to everybody with a computer and an Internet connection.

In addition to electronic commuting technology has given us a biological revolution. Watson & Crick, using the results of Franklin, first decoded the structure of DNA in 1953 (when I was talking to steamroller men).  Progress in biology has been even more spectacular than that in electronics in the intervening period.  Not only is it possible to move genes from one species to another but we are close to creating life from its raw chemical constituents.  Biotechnology will define the 21st century and it is very possible that it will play a part in finding a replacement to oil.

 

 

No comments

Travel

Israel

 

 

 

2023 Addendum

 

It's a decade since this visit to Israel in September 2014.

From July until just a month before we arrived, Israeli troops had been conducting an 'operation' against Hamas in the Gaza strip, in the course of which 469 Israeli soldiers lost their lives.  The country was still reeling. 

17,200 Garzan homes were totally destroyed and three times that number were seriously damaged.  An estimated 2,000 (who keeps count) civilians died in the destruction.  'Bibi' Netanyahu, who had ordered the Operation, declared it a victory.

This time it's on a grander scale: a 'War', and Bibi has vowed to wipe-out Hamas.

Pundits have been moved to speculate on the Hamas strategy, that was obviously premeditated. In addition to taking hostages, it involving sickening brutality against obvious innocents, with many of the worst images made and published by themselves. 

It seemed to be deliberate provocation, with a highly predictable outcome.

Martyrdom?  

Historically, Hamas have done Bibi no harm.  See: 'For years, Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now it’s blown up in our faces' in the Israel Times.

Thinking about our visit, I've been moved to wonder how many of today's terrorists were children a decade ago?  How many saw their loved ones: buried alive; blown apart; maimed for life; then dismissed by Bibi as: 'collateral damage'? 

And how many of the children, now stumbling in the rubble, will, in their turn, become terrorists against the hated oppressor across the barrier?

Is Bibi's present purge a good strategy for assuring future harmony?

I commend my decade old analysis to you: A Brief Modern History and Is there a solution?

Comments: 
Since posting the above I've been sent the following article, implicating religious belief, with which I substantially agree, save for its disregarding the Jewish fundamentalists'/extremists' complicity; amplifying the present horrors: The Bright Line Between Good and Evil 

Another reader has provided a link to a perspective similar to my own by Australian 'Elder Statesman' John MenadueHamas, Gaza and the continuing Zionist project.  His Pearls and Irritations site provides a number of articles relating to the current Gaza situation. Worth a read.

The Economist has since reported and unusual spate of short-selling immediately preceding the attacks: Who made millions trading the October 7th attacks?  

Money-making by someone in the know? If so, it's beyond evil.

 

 

A Little Background

The land between the Jordan river and the Mediterranean Sea, known as Palestine, is one of the most fought over in human history.  Anthropologists believe that the first humans to leave Africa lived in and around this region and that all non-African humans are related to these common ancestors who lived perhaps 70,000 years ago.  At first glance this interest seems odd, because as bits of territory go it's nothing special.  These days it's mostly desert and semi-desert.  Somewhere back-o-Bourke might look similar, if a bit redder. 

Yet since humans have kept written records, Egyptians, Canaanites, Philistines, Ancient Israelites, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Byzantines, early Muslims, Christian Crusaders, Ottomans (and other later Muslims), British and Zionists, have all fought to control this land.  This has sometimes been for strategic reasons alone but often partly for affairs of the heart, because this land is steeped in history and myth. 

Read more: Israel

Fiction, Recollections & News

On Point Counter Point

 

 

 

 

Recently I've been re-reading Point Counter Point by Aldus Huxley. 

Many commentators call it his masterpiece. Modern Library lists it as number 44 on its list of the 100 best 20th century novels in English yet there it ranks well below Brave New World (that's 5th), also by  Aldus Huxley. 

The book was an experimental novel and consists of a series of conversations, some internal to a character, the character's thoughts, in which a proposition is put and then a counterargument is presented, reflecting a musical contrapuntal motif.

Among his opposed characters are nihilists, communists, rationalists, social butterflies, transcendentalists, and the leader of the British Freemen (fascists cum Brexiteers, as we would now describe them).

Taken as a whole, it's an extended debate on 'the meaning of life'. And at one point, in my young-adult life, Point Counter Point was very influential.

Read more: On Point Counter Point

Opinions and Philosophy

Death

 

 

Death is one of the great themes of existence that interests almost everyone but about which many people avoid discussion.  It is also discussed in my essay to my children: The Meaning of Life on this website; written more than ten years ago; where I touch on personal issues not included below; such as risk taking and the option of suicide.

Read more: Death

Terms of Use

Terms of Use                                                                    Copyright